eigenvox
Positioning · How we differ

One voice.
Yours.

Most AI writing tools produce text that sounds vaguely human. EigenVox produces text that sounds like you — extracted from your corpus, anchored to your fingerprint.

The difference

What everyone else gets wrong.

AI GENERATORS

Others

Clones your audio voice

~1 minute of clean recording → text-to-speech in your spoken voice. Answers the question: 'make this text sound like me when read aloud.'

EigenVox

Clones your written voice

~10,000 words of your prose → rewrites and expansions that read the way you write. Sentence rhythm, function-word habits, signature phrases, taboos.

They answer "make this sound like me." We answer "make this read like I wrote it."

HUMANIZERS

Others

Lower the AI detector score

Rewrite AI output so it looks generically human. They don't know who you are — output reads like a different generic human every time.

EigenVox

Write as a specific person — you

PersonaSpec is extracted from your actual writing. Two EigenVox users with different fingerprints get measurably different rewrites of the same input.

They target "human-sounding." We target you, specifically.

VANILLA LLM

Others

"Write this in user X's voice"

No fingerprint to anchor on. The model makes a generic stylistic guess — impressionistic at best, inconsistent across runs.

EigenVox

PersonaSpec + best-of-N reranking

Cadence stats, function-word profile, signature/taboo phrases go into the system prompt. N candidates are generated and reranked by a frozen discriminative scorer.

≥+15 pp attribution lift vs zero-shot Claude. Pre-committed Go/No-Go gate, not a marketing claim.